Investment
Experts
Compare and Contrast
Editor's Note: In early October,
Funding Your Future talked to State Street Research
and Management Company's* Jim Weiss, senior vice president
and deputy chief of the equity group. The Vanguard
Group's Joel Dickson, investment analyst in the portfolio
review department, and Mike Gardner, senior vice president
and portfolio manager of TDRP's FISA. We discussed
how today's stock market and economy compare to October
1987, when the market fell 20%. Following are excerpts
from that conversation.
Funding
Your Future: Stock
market watchers see similarities between 1987 and
1997 and fear there will be another sell-off like
the one 10 years ago. What's your take on the market
situation today?
Weiss:
We see three fundamental factors that are quite different
from 1987. The first is continuing positive surprises
in earnings growth, both on a company and a general
level. Back in 1987, earnings were OK, but we weren't
getting as consistent a pattern of quarter-by-quarter
growth. The second factor is spectacular good inflation
news (2.5 to 3% now compared to 5-6% in '87). The
third factor is a strong dollar today versus a weak
dollar back in 1987. More importantly, I think we
have a much stronger Treasury Department than we did
back then.
|
Dickson:
It's true that stock prices in '97 are on the
high side, just as they were in '87. But that doesn't
necessarily mean prices will fall again. It just means
that, compared to historical norms, they're a little
high.
Gardner:
The low inflation has kept interest rate low, a critical
factor in economic growth.
Interest rates drive bond market returns, the cost
of capitol, equity returns, growth - it really all
starts there. Interest rates determine how much consumers
can borrow to buy goods and services, and how much
business can reinvest for future growth.
FYF:
The Federal Reserve raised interest rates in August
of '87. Not long there-after, stock prices fell. The
Federal Reserve raised rates slightly in March of
this year. Can we expect the same reaction before
the end of 1997?
Dickson:
The Fed raised interest rates in both years for the
same reason: higher-than-expected economic growth,
which raised fears of accelerating inflation. As we
look back now, it appears the Fed's action 10 years
ago may have stifled growth too much. Today the markets
believe the Fed has done a better job of allowing
the economy to expand at
continued on page 2
|